In our continuing coverage of Vermont’s grand experiment to become a single-payer health care state, here’s a recent dispatch from our intern, Fran Cronin:
On May 26, Vermont’s newly elected governor, Peter Shumlin, signed Act 48, a new law that will eventually create the nation’s first single-payer health care system.
At a panel this week sponsored by the Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation of Massachusetts and held in downtown Boston, four experts offered their thoughts — some which might serve as lessons for Massachusetts as we embark on phase two of health reform, with a focus on containing costs while offering quality care.
Lesson One: Everything Is Political
Anya Radar Wallack, Ph.D., and Special Assistant to Vermont’s Governor Shumlin for Health Care Reform said Shumlin’s campaign was centered around health care reform, and that the new governor successfully explained to voters how Vermont’s health care system was failing them. He also laid out an economic argument for change. When Shumlin was campaigning, Wallack says, health care spending had tripled between 1992 and 2009 and had exceeded the national average. He made it clear that change was important for consumers.
Lesson Two: Buy-In For All (Or, Don’t Forget Hillary’s Health Care Disaster)
William Hsiao, Ph.D., K.T. Li Professor of Economics, Director of Health Systems Program, Harvard School of Public Health took Shumlin’s vision and detailed how it bring it into reality. To develop a viable plan, says Hsiao, you have to first understand the political stakeholders: politicians, insurers, physicians, hospitals, big business, the Chamber of Commerce, and grass roots organizations. “You have to identify the barriers [to change] and navigate around them.” “Like a game of chess,” says Hsiao, “you need to get to checkmate.”
Of the host of structural recommendations Hsiao made, Vermont accepted four. They are: the creation of an independent board that will facilitate direct negotiations between providers and recipients and the de-coupling of health insurance from employment; (According to Hsiao, the United States is one of the few advanced nations in the world with this insurance model. “De-coupling,” he says, “would be a huge step forward.”) Third, instead of employers paying for insurance, the state would implement an employee payroll tax to cover the cost of the state’s insurance fund. With a large and centralized asset pool, the state could make access and care more uniform. “We need to bring the uninsured up to the same level of care as the insured,” says Hsiao. Fourth, aggressively launch a public-private partnership. With a modest 625,000 people, Vermont is uniquely positioned to align itself with the states largest insurer, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont. (If Hsiao’s calculations are correct, he says Vermont could save $500 million per year with a single payer system. )
Lesson Three: Test Out A Bunch Of Ideas, And Don’t Be Afraid To Nudge
Michael Frasier, a democratic representative in the Vermont State House of Representatives says Frasier says much of the credit for the bill’s passage comes from “a good election” and perhaps even a little Velcro. In trying to nudge the legislature forward, he says, “You have to throw things up on the wall and hope they stick.” Continue reading